A step towards inclusivity and progress

25/03/2024

The abrogation of Article 370 of the Indian Constitution, which granted special status to the region of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), has been a subject of intense debate and scrutiny since its inception, and even more so since its repeal in August 2019. In a recent address in Singapore, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar reiterated the stance of the Indian government, positing that Article 370 was not only a temporary measure but also an impediment to the extension of progressive laws in J&K and Ladakh. Article 370 was indeed crafted as a temporary provision, with the aim of easing J&K's accession to India during a turbulent period. However, it inadvertently fostered a sense of separatism and exclusivity that, according to many, fuelled violence and terrorism, and posed a challenge to national security. Minister Jaishankar's assertion that the article prevented the extension of progressive legislation to the region calls for a nuanced examination of the socio-political landscape of J&K, both pre and post the repeal of Article 370.
Before its abrogation, Article 370 allowed J&K to have its own constitution, a separate flag, and autonomy over the internal administration of the state, except in foreign affairs, defense, finance, and communications. This special status meant that many central laws, including those regarding property rights, education, and reservation policies, were not applicable in the region unless specifically allowed by the state government. Since the revocation of Article 370, the Indian government has endeavored to integrate J&K more closely with the rest of the country, with promises of economic development, eradication of terrorism, and the application of national laws to ensure equality and justice for all citizens. The change is projected to open doors to opportunities that were previously unavailable to the people of J&K, such as increased investment, better educational facilities, and improved infrastructure. However, the transition has not been without its challenges. The move was met with a communication blackout, detentions of political leaders, and a heavy security presence in the region, raising concerns about human rights and civil liberties. The government's approach has been criticized as heavy-handed, and the resultant lockdown raised questions about the democratic process.
As Minister Jaishankar points out, the benefits of the change are now reportedly visible, yet it is imperative that these benefits are measured against the backdrop of the lived realities of the people of J&K and Ladakh. In this transformative phase, the government must ensure that the introduction of new laws and policies is done through inclusive dialogue and that the voices of the local population are heard and respected. Going forward, the true test of progress will be in the tangible improvement in the lives of the residents of J&K and Ladakh. It will be observed in their access to quality education, healthcare, and employment, the return of peace and normalcy, and the flourishing of democracy.

Photo Gallery

BSE Sensex

NSE Nifty